Energy Transition Absurdities

Energy Transition Absurdities

Share this post

Energy Transition Absurdities
Energy Transition Absurdities
Doug Sheridan: Thoughts on a Different Kind of Energy Transition

Doug Sheridan: Thoughts on a Different Kind of Energy Transition

David Blackmon's avatar
David Blackmon
Oct 17, 2024
∙ Paid
13

Share this post

Energy Transition Absurdities
Energy Transition Absurdities
Doug Sheridan: Thoughts on a Different Kind of Energy Transition
6
1
Share
Inclusion of natural gas and nuclear in the "green taxonomy": Brussels ...

[Note: For those not familiar with him, Doug Sheridan is a keen energy analyst and commentor who writes commentaries on LinkedIn each day. I read him on a regular basis and, if you are on LinkedIn, you should read him, too. The commentary published here gives Doug’s thoughts on what an alternative form of energy transition could look like, if we had wise people in charge of making policy.]

Share

The world must balance the need to power the global economy and higher living standards with keeping global emissions in check. The current approach is clearly failing. So, we again offer our thoughts on a better way forward—

We support more baseload nuclear and natural gas—and, as able, geothermal and hydro—generation in lieu of coal, solar and wind. Streamline permitting. We also need more load-following gas-fired plants to handle daily and seasonal variability, while simultaneously prioritizing reductions in methane emissions that might undermine gas's environmental benefits.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Energy Transition Absurdities to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 David Blackmon
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share