Electricity Cost Study Shows How the GOP Can Win on the Affordability Issue
Will the affordability issue decide the balance of power in congress this November? Democrats have pounded on the issue over the last several months based on polling data indicating many Americans blame President Donald Trump and the Republicans for the high cost of living, having apparently forgotten the four years of record inflation brought on by the Biden Autopen presidency and a Democrat-dominated congress.
The cost of electricity has served as one of the focal points for Democrat messaging, as rates continued rising during 2025, driven by massive demand from the booming AI datacenter industry. But a new report by the Institute for Energy Research (IER) warns that Democrat candidates should consider treading lightly on this narrative, because it could backfire on them and their campaigns.
A recent study published by IER – titled “Blue States, High Rates” - supports Democrat claims that the rate of increase in power rates accelerated during 2025: After rising 27% across the four years of the Biden presidency, U.S. consumers endured another 11% increase in the average electricity bill last year.
But, the study adds, “[e]lectricity prices are especially high in traditionally liberal areas of the country. In total, 86% of states with electricity prices above the national average in the continental U.S. are reliably blue, having voted for the Democratic nominee for president in the 2020 and 2024 elections.” Of the 10 states saddled with the highest utility rates in the nation in 2025, only one – Alaska – ranks as a fairly reliable “red” state in presidential elections.
By contrast, the 9 other states which fill out that dubious Top 10 read like a Murderer’s Row of the most notorious “blue” states in the country: Hawaii, California, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Maine, New York, New Hampshire, and Washington, DC.
The contrast with the states with the lowest power rates is stark, with 8 of the lowest 10 reliably “red,” and one – Nevada – falling into the “purple” category since it has alternated between the Republican and Democrat presidential candidates in recent election cycles. The only “blue” state ranked among the cheapest 10 is New Mexico, whose utility rates benefit greatly from a power grid supplied largely by natural gas thanks to it being home to the Western extent of the Permian Basin.
So, what factors cause the liberal states to suffer from higher electricity costs than more conservative states? IER cites a variety of reasons, but says that, more than any other single driver, “electricity prices are a direct result of state energy policies because states have the exclusive power to decide which resources supply their grids.” By and large, this means that states which have gone in whole hog on mandates and costly incentives for “renewables,” – most often wind and/or solar – suffer with higher utility costs than states which have mostly avoided the climate alarm fever dreams.
Not surprisingly, the study cites Gavin Newsom’s California, trailing only Hawaii as the 2nd most expensive state in the country, as a prime example of irrational government policies forcing higher costs on rate payers.
“Governor Newsom and California’s state legislature have embraced numerous policies that intentionally increase electricity rates, including a carbon dioxide reduction mandate, renewable mandates, solar cost-shifting (net metering), nuclear reactor closures, and EV charging subsidies, to name a few,” IER says, adding that, “Instead of trying to expand electricity generation to meet the energy needs of Californians, California is second in the country in electricity imports, as it embeds policy goals in electric rates to drive social policy. This is a toxic mix for California’s ratepayers.”
So, why does Texas, which sports more wind and solar capacity than any other state by far, rank among the 11 cheapest electricity states in this study? Because, while Texas did enact a renewable portfolio standard in 2001, it has avoided enacting any of the other unsound policies California has pursued and still generates the majority of its electricity with natural gas plants.
What this all means is that, if Republicans are smart about laying out the facts to voters on this “affordability” issue in the fall campaign, they, not the Democrats will win the argument in November.
That is all.
Hope springs eternal, David. Just like with the Biden caused "affordability" crisis, the MSM will spin the rate increases as being caused by Trump's policies. Wind energy is almost free, right, and Trump has done everything in his power to stop it, and people will believe it. I see it at meetings in my once reliably Republican town in CT where residents seem all-in on any and every energy scheme -- wind, solar, geothermal, distributed energy -- that will actually increase costs rather than reduce them. They’re brainwashed technical Know-Nothings but still such a voting force that even our remaining Republican representatives have to cater to them by talking about how we need more battery storage to make these schemes work, when I'm sure they know that will never happen to the degree necessary to make a difference. No one dares mention pipelines, that's for sure. Gotta give Trump and Wright credit for trying to bend to the curve and return some sanity to the energy debate, but at least around here I think its hopeless.
If the Republicans could explain that reality as well as you just did, they'd be in a good position to shape the narrative. However , it fell apart when you said if the republicans are smart enough.