Energy Transition Absurdities

Energy Transition Absurdities

Share this post

Energy Transition Absurdities
Energy Transition Absurdities
Washington Update From The U.S. Oil & Gas Association - 7.07.2023

Washington Update From The U.S. Oil & Gas Association - 7.07.2023

David Blackmon's avatar
David Blackmon
Jul 08, 2023
∙ Paid
13

Share this post

Energy Transition Absurdities
Energy Transition Absurdities
Washington Update From The U.S. Oil & Gas Association - 7.07.2023
1
Share

Washington Update

July 7, 2023

The Supreme Court Term Ends: 

The Supreme Court’s term ended last week and we watched the Court working to limit the discretion of regulators and requiring Congress be much more specific as they write laws rather than defer to the unelected bureaucrats in the Executive Branch. There is no better example of that than the two-decade saga to rein in EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers' regulatory overreach under the Clean Water Act. 

When Congress passed the Clean Water Act, it prohibited the “discharge of any pollutant by any person” into “navigable waters” without a permit. That makes sense, but then Congress defined “navigable waters” as “waters of the United States.” But what should be considered “waters of the United States”? That is what regulatory agencies and the courts have been trying to define for the last 50 years. 

Share

Unsurprisingly, EPA has stretched and stretched and stretched its regulatory authority to almost any wetlands or water in the United States. EPA employed the “glancing goose” test arguing that if migratory geese could see a water-filled pothole, EPA should be able to regulate it. We kid you not.  

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Energy Transition Absurdities to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 David Blackmon
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share